Emon Van Loben Sels vs Felix Corwin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Aug at 04:20 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Van Loben Sels vs F. Corwin

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sels 1 - 0 Corwin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emon Van Loben Sels winning 2 and Felix Corwin winning 0. The last match between Emon Van Loben Sels and Felix Corwin was at the M25 Southaven, 07-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Emon Van Loben Sels getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sels | 1 |
| Corwin | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Southaven(08-07-25)
E. V. L. Sels vs F. Corwin H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.38% (19-13) | Career Total W/L | 58.43% (260-185) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. V. L. Sels vs F. Corwin Match Preview:
- In recent months, Sels outshines Corwin in second serve effectiveness, winning 42.38% of points compared to Corwin's 39.58%. Does this indicate stronger serve reliability from Sels? Yes, it suggests a slight edge in serve consistency.
- Regarding return game stats, Corwin has the upper hand on second serve returns with 47.42% compared to Sels' 44.27%. However, Sels dominates in first serve return points, securing 35.04% versus Corwin's 27.69%. Can Sels capitalize on first serve returns better? It seems so.
- When handling pressure, such as saving break points, Sels is more efficient at 50%, while Corwin manages 42.27%.
- Looking at overall match wins from the past year, Sels has a slight advantage, winning 60% of matches, whereas Corwin is at 56.36%.
- Both players excel on hard courts, but Corwin's broader match record on this surface shows a higher win percentage at 60% compared to Sels' 58%.
- Analyzing competition levels, Corwin has faced relatively lower-ranked opponents on average, ranked 458.58, compared to Sels' opponents averaging a rank of 318.5.
- In matches that go to a deciding set, Corwin performs significantly better, winning 53% of such sets, while Sels has managed only 25% victories.
- Sels currently shows a superior breakpoint conversion rate of 53.13% in recent months, contrasting with Corwin's 38.24%.
Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing their recent performances, Sels appears to have the edge in critical service stats, particularly with a stronger second serve and superior breakpoint conversion rate. These factors can be decisive in tight matches.
While Corwin demonstrates higher success in second serve returns and has the advantage in deciding set win percentage, their lower effectiveness in converting breakpoints could be a weakness in the upcoming match.
Overall, given Sels' better handling of pressure situations and ability to convert opportunities, it seems probable that Sels will emerge as the victor in this upcoming face-off with Corwin.
Emon Van Loben Sels vs Felix Corwin Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. V. L. Sels vs F. Corwin H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:29:14 | Average Match Time | 1:29:14 |
| 60% (37/62) | 1st Serve % | 44% (14/32) |
| 59% (22/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 52% (13/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 10% (1/10) |
| 53% (17/32) | Return Points Win % | 44% (27/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. V. L. Sels Recent Matches Played
F. Corwin Recent Matches Played

E. V. L. Sels vs F. Corwin Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.38% (19/13) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.43% (260/185) |
| 59.74% (46/31) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.26% (584/454) |
| 53.68% (401/346) | Games Win/Loss | 52.73% (5151/4617) |
| 59.38% (19/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.59% (150/106) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.82% (70/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (40/30) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 45 | Aces Total | 1879 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 65 | Total Double Faults | 1498 |
| 1:15:57 | Average Match Time | 1:31:22 |
| 289.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.92 |
| 61% (875/1428) | 1st Serve % | 57% (14849/25941) |
| 64% (557/875) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (10442/14849) |
| 48% (266/553) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5074/11092) |
| 40% (63/156) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1237/2903) |
| 42% (605/1450) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11237/26932) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 43.66% (31/40) |
| 63.33% (19/11) | Futures W/L | 61.39% (229/144) |
| 59% (19/32) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (256/441) |
| 56% (5/9) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (62/125) |
| 38% (5/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (83/153) |
| 71% (21/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (250/211) |
| 29% (21/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (250/39) |
| 36% (11/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (194/47) |